home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 94 20:02:38 PDT
- From: Info-Hams Mailing List and Newsgroup <info-hams@ucsd.edu>
- Errors-To: Info-Hams-Errors@UCSD.Edu
- Reply-To: Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu
- Precedence: Bulk
- Subject: Info-Hams Digest V94 #979
- To: Info-Hams
-
-
- Info-Hams Digest Tue, 30 Aug 94 Volume 94 : Issue 979
-
- Today's Topics:
- 5200 Crossband
- [Q] On how to program Cardinal sound card, article. where ?
- Announcing two new mailing lists
- best price for FT900??
- FCC Processing data point - new Tech (2 msgs)
- Is the DX server ok?
- learning CW
- New Yaesu FT900, any reports (2 msgs)
- Number of Call Signs (4 msgs)
- Radio Shack mast (2 msgs)
- SSTV Question
- WANTED: Old HP parts/equipment
- WTD: Repeater directory in ASCII (New England/NY)
-
- Send Replies or notes for publication to: <Info-Hams@UCSD.Edu>
- Send subscription requests to: <Info-Hams-REQUEST@UCSD.Edu>
- Problems you can't solve otherwise to brian@ucsd.edu.
-
- Archives of past issues of the Info-Hams Digest are available
- (by FTP only) from UCSD.Edu in directory "mailarchives/info-hams".
-
- We trust that readers are intelligent enough to realize that all text
- herein consists of personal comments and does not represent the official
- policies or positions of any party. Your mileage may vary. So there.
- ----------------------------------------------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Aug 1994 14:31:40 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!ucsnews!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.umbc.edu!eff!news.duke.edu!duke.edu!jbs@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: 5200 Crossband
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- In article <Jq1QOkc.anaylor@delphi.com> Andrew Naylor <anaylor@delphi.com> writes:
- >Is there a process for getting the Yaesu 5200 into crossband mode?
- >I figure so, but havent found a way.
-
- Yup. Set up the freqs you want on both bands, set squelch, DTMF, etc., and
- then turn the rig off. Hold down the "RPT" button and turn the rig back
- on. Presto, you're there.
-
- -joe
- --
- "When personal freedom's being abused, | "In Canada we have something called
- you have to move to limit it." | multiculturalism - you will find the
- | whole spectrum of races living in
- - U.S. President Bill Clinton, 1994 | Toronto's slums." -A Canadian
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1994 15:39:44 GMT
- From: psinntp!arrl.org!jbloom@uunet.uu.net
- Subject: [Q] On how to program Cardinal sound card, article. where ?
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- ALFRED C WONG (cs902034@ariel.cs.yorku.ca) wrote:
- : Hello world,
-
- : Sometime ago, someone called Johan Forrer wrote an article in QEX , AUGUST 1994
- : issue on how program Cardinal sound card...
-
- : Right now, I have the SDK for that article, but I don't know where I can find
- : a copy of that article.
-
- : Can anyone help me out what is the long name of QEX and what is the publisher ?
- : Or, can anyone send me a copy of that article thru mail or FAX ?
-
- QEX is published by The American Radio Relay League, 225 Main Street,
- Newington, CT 06111. For information about copies of articles or back
- issues, you can write to that address or email: lweinberg@arrl.org
- --
- Jon Bloom KE3Z jbloom@arrl.org
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1994 14:29:25 GMT
- From: netcomsv!netcom.com!n1ist@decwrl.dec.com
- Subject: Announcing two new mailing lists
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- Announcing two new Ham-related mailing lists!
-
- qrp-l: This is the qrp mailing list, previously maintained by Bruce
- Walker at Think.com. It is for discussions about the design,
- construction, and use of qrp (low power) radios and related
- equipment.
-
- arrl-ve-list: This is a one-way list, run by Bart Jahnke of the ARRL
- VEC, for announcements to VEs and VE teams.
-
- These two lists join the other ham radio related lists maintained here at
- Netcom:
-
- barc-list: Information, discussion and anouncements for the Boston Amateur
- Radio Club and hams in Eastern Massachusetts.
- w1aw-list: ARRL bulletins, news, and information
- newsline-list: Redistribution of Amateur Radio Newsline
- letter-list: Redistribution of the ARRL Letter
- barc-races: RACES in Massachusetts and emergency management
- fox-list: Fox hunting and Radio Direction Finding
- ky1n-list: VE exams in New England
- fieldorg-l: ARRL field organization discussions
- ham-tech: Technical discussions and questions about Amateur Radio
- arrl-exam-list: amateur radio license examinations scheduled in the US and
- in some foreign areas.
- arrl-nediv-list: bi-monthly bulletins from the ARRL NE Division director
-
-
- These lists are automatically maintained by Majordomo. To sign up or
- inquire about these lists, send mail to listserv@netcom.com with the
- following in the body (subject is ignored) of the message. <listname>
- is the name of the list to subscribe to.
-
- To subscribe: subscribe <listname>
-
- To unsubscribe: unsubscribe <listname>
-
- For more information: help
-
- To post (to the two-way lists), send your message to <listname>@netcom.com
-
- Mail should be sent to listserv@netcom.com, not listserv@world.std.com.
-
- Please keep your mailing address up to date. If your account is being
- changed or shut down, please update majordomo. If your mail bounces for
- 'no such user' or 'no such machine', you will be removed from the lists.
-
- These lists are sponsored by the Boston Amateur Radio Club.
- If you have any questions, I can be reached at n1ist@netcom.com
- For more information on the Boston ARC, subscribe to barc-list
-
- 73,
- Michael L. Ardai N1IST
- --
- \|/ Michael L. Ardai N1IST Teradyne ATB, Boston MA
- -*- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- /|\ ardai@maven.dnet.teradyne.com n1ist@netcom.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 AUG 94 09:04:01
- From: pa.dec.com!crl.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!mrnews.mro.dec.com!fccvde.enet.dec.com!klimasewski@decwrl.dec.com
- Subject: best price for FT900??
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- I received a price of $1399 w/tuner + $60.00 for remote cable
- $100.00 less without tuner.
-
- Can I buy this cheaper?
-
- Ken
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Aug 1994 14:05:11 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!wizard.uark.edu!comp!plaws@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: FCC Processing data point - new Tech
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- My friend, Clendon, passed his test for Tech. He just got his license.
- Here are the details:
-
- Passed Exam: 5/21/94 (at Tulsa)
- License issued: 8/20/94
- License rec'd: 8/27/94
-
- Total time: 98 days - 14 weeks to the day
-
-
- He is now happily signing KC5JDO ... :-)
-
- (yes I gave him SuperMorse ... :)
-
- Peter Laws<plaws@comp.uark.edu>|"Suppose you were a politician. Now suppose you
- n5uwy@ka5bml.#nwar.ar.usa.noam |were an idiot. Ah, but I repeat myself."-Twain
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1994 10:54:47 -0500
- From: agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news1.oakland.edu!news.nd.edu!nimtziici.edmedia.nd.edu!user@ames.arpa
- Subject: FCC Processing data point - new Tech
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- Another new license data point,
-
- My wife passed her tech exam July 15, 1994
- her license was issued August 22, 1994
- it was received by her August 27, 1994
-
- A wait of approximately 6 weeks.
-
- Now I am married to N9YHI.
-
- N9TJG
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Nimtz INTERNET: Nimtz.1@nd.edu
- Chief Technician/LAN Administrator FAX: +1 219 631 8777
- Educational Media Voice: +1 219 631 8783
- University of Notre Dame, B16 DeBartolo Hall, Notre Dame, IN 46556 USA
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Vanity of vanities, says the Teacher, vanity of vanities! All is vanity.
- What do people gain from all the toil at which they toil under the sun?
- A generation goes, and a generation comes, but the earth remains forever.
- Eccl. 1:2-4 (NSRV)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Aug 1994 16:23:41 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!prairienet.org!tigger@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: Is the DX server ok?
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- I haven't received anything from the DX server in about a week,
- except for posts with no text whatsoever. They asre simply
- addressed to "dx-request@unbc.edu" and are from "dx-redist@unbc.edu"
- No text. Is the server down, or am I down? Any clues?
- Thanks for the info.
- --
- Sean E. Kutzko Amateur Radio: KF9PL
- General Manager, WEFT 90.1 FM DXCC: 288wkd/275cfmd
- Champaign-Urbana, Illinois Grid: EN50vc
- Support your community radio station!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1994 16:36:11 GMT
- From: psinntp!arrl.org!ehare@uunet.uu.net
- Subject: learning CW
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- Mark Monninger (rapw20@email.sps.mot.com) wrote:
-
- : I dunno for sure, Derek, but my guess is that very few people actually use
- : <CW> on the air. They learn it to pass the tests (which are sent in perfectly
- : formed, non-QRM'ed fashion) and then don't use it. There are exceptions, of
- : course.
-
- : No flames, please...just making an observation with no value judgements
- : attached.
-
- Well, no flames intended, but this is certainly not my experience. Many of
- the hams I talk to at club meetings, etc., use CW on the air; many do not.
-
- According to a scientific survey conducted by the ARRL (performed by a
- survey-research company, random samples, etc.), an overall 38% of hams use
- CW on a regular basis. This date includes ARRL Members and Technicians, so
- it is not weighted in any particular direction. While it is not a majority
- of hams, it is not a number that I would characterize as "very few." I
- suspect that your impression comes more from the informal data you gather
- from the circle of hams you talk to on the air. If you don't operate CW, you
- may find that your data are weighted more toward the no-code end. If I were
- to survey my on-the-air contacts, I would find that they are 99% CW users,
- but I don't even know where my microphone is. :-)
-
- I am glad that there is room on the bands for all of us.
-
- 73, Ed
- --
- Ed Hare, KA1CV, ARRL Laboratory, 225 Main, Newington, CT 06111
- 203-666-1541 ehare@arrl.org
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Aug 1994 15:52:14 GMT
- From: agate!cat.cis.Brown.EDU!adis-204.adis.brown.edu!user@ames.arpa
- Subject: New Yaesu FT900, any reports
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- In article <33t28g$gsh@gv-gate.gvg.tek.com>, randyh@gvgadg.gvg.tek.com
- (Randy Hall) wrote:
-
- > In article <33sper$ghp@mrnews.mro.dec.com>
- klimasewski@fccvde.enet.dec.com (My name is...) writes:
- > >
- > >Is this new rig available? Any user comments?
- > >
- > >Ken
- >
- > How much?
-
- Around $1300 US. Makes the thing look damned attractive when you compare
- it with the Kenwood TS-50S.
-
- --
- == Tony Pelliccio, KD1NR Tel: (401) 863-1880
- == Box 1908, Providence, RI 02912 Fax: (401) 863-2269
- == Opinions herein are mine and not those of my employer.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 94 11:51:48 PDT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!cs.utexas.edu!convex!news.onramp.net!usenet@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: New Yaesu FT900, any reports
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- I bought one last weekend from Texas Towers for $1299 including tuner. Remote kit is $59.
-
- Works great! Looking for Mars mod.
-
- -G
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Aug 1994 13:59:13 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsfeed.ksu.ksu.edu!moe.ksu.ksu.edu!wizard.uark.edu!comp!plaws@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: Number of Call Signs
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- tdenny@bigcat.missouri.EDU (Thomas P. Denny) writes:
-
- >1by1 calls: (4)(10)(26) = 1,040
- >1by2 calls: (4)(10)(26)(26) = 27,040
- >1by3 calls: (4)(10)(26)(26)(26) = 703,040
-
- The point is made, but the math is off a little: The US only has the
- AA-AL callsign block. Therefore, the 1by* calls should multiply by 3 not
- 4. Still, makes you wonder how they decide their "out of" callsigns ...
-
- Peter Laws<plaws@comp.uark.edu>|"Suppose you were a politician. Now suppose you
- n5uwy@ka5bml.#nwar.ar.usa.noam |were an idiot. Ah, but I repeat myself."-Twain
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1994 09:30:27 EDT
- From: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!howland.reston.ans.net!news.cac.psu.edu!news.pop.psu.edu!psuvax1!psuvm!n5x@ames.arpa
- Subject: Number of Call Signs
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- In article <Pine.3.89.9408300820.A5777-0100000@bigcat>,
- tdenny@bigcat.missouri.EDU (Thomas P. Denny) says:
-
- >OK, basic math quiz time -
- >Everyone knows that the FCC says they've used up all the call
- >signs of a certain type in some areas, i.e. the 1by3 calls in
- >districts 0, 4, 5, 6, 7, & 8 and 2by2 Extra Class calls in
- >Hawaii, Alaska, & Puerto Rico.
- >I have seen articles on the history of call signs in the
- >US, and how the FCC has allocated them and for what reasons
- >over the years, however, I was wondering just how many call signs
- >(that is, combinations of letters and numbers) does the FCC
- >really have at its disposal. Therefore I humbly submit the
- >following;
-
- >1by1 calls: (4)(10)(26) = 1,040
- >1by2 calls: (4)(10)(26)(26) = 27,040
- >1by3 calls: (4)(10)(26)(26)(26) = 703,040
- ^
- ^ [more calculations deleted]
- Should be a 3 here, U.S. doesn't have 1 by anything calls starting with
- A.
- 73's Jim KB3KJ
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Aug 1994 13:51:01 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!overload.lbl.gov!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!vixen.cso.uiuc.edu!newsrelay.iastate.edu!news.iastate.edu!wjturner@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: Number of Call Signs
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- In article <Pine.3.89.9408300820.A5777-0100000@bigcat> tdenny@bigcat.missouri.EDU (Thomas P. Denny) writes:
- >I was wondering just how many call signs
- >(that is, combinations of letters and numbers) does the FCC
- >really have at its disposal. Therefore I humbly submit the
- >following;
-
- Just a few corrections, since we do not have all of the "A"s for
- prefixes...
-
- >1by1 calls: (4)(10)(26) = 1,040
-
- actually: (3)(10)(26) = 780
-
- I don't know how fair it is to count these, since the FCC has not ever
- (I believe) issued them. Shouldn't matter too much since there are only
- 780 of them, anyway.
-
- >1by2 calls: (4)(10)(26)(26) = 27,040
-
- actually: (3)(10)(26)(26) = 20,280
-
- >1by3 calls: (4)(10)(26)(26)(26) = 703,040
-
- actually: (3)(10)(26)(26)(26) = 527,280
-
- The rest are correct, I believe. (We only have AAA-ALZ, right?)
-
- >2by1 calls: (3)(26)(10)(26) + (1)(12)(10)(26) = 23,400
- >2by2 calls: (3)(26)(10)(26)(26) + (1)(12)(10)(26)(26) = 608,400
- >2by3 calls:
- >(3)(26)(10)(26)(26)(26) + (1)(12)(10)(26)(26)(26) = 15,818,400
-
- So the total is now 16,998,540 with the 600,000 or so currently in use
- being (still) about 3.5%.
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Aug 1994 14:05:12 GMT
- From: ihnp4.ucsd.edu!agate!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!news.umbc.edu!haven.umd.edu!cville-srv.wam.umd.edu!ham@network.ucsd.edu
- Subject: Number of Call Signs
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- >I have seen articles on the history of call signs in the
- >US, and how the FCC has allocated them and for what reasons
- >over the years, however, I was wondering just how many call signs
- >(that is, combinations of letters and numbers) does the FCC
- >really have at its disposal. Therefore I humbly submit the
- >following;
- >
- These are incorrect:
-
- >1by1 calls: (4)(10)(26) = 1,040
- >1by2 calls: (4)(10)(26)(26) = 27,040
- >1by3 calls: (4)(10)(26)(26)(26) = 703,040
-
- These are correct:
-
- >2by1 calls: (3)(26)(10)(26) + (1)(12)(10)(26) = 23,400
- >2by2 calls: (3)(26)(10)(26)(26) + (1)(12)(10)(26)(26) = 608,400
- >2by3 calls:
- >(3)(26)(10)(26)(26)(26) + (1)(12)(10)(26)(26)(26) = 15,818,400
- >
- >Which gives a raw total of 17,181,320 (of which about 3.5% are in
- >use currently (600,000)).
-
- Actually, this doesn't QUITE work because only AA-AL are U.S.
- prefixes. Ever wonder why a Novice who upgrades to Technician
- puts a "/KT" after their sign, when all others are "AG, AA, AE?"
-
- AG, AA, and AE are valid US prefixes. AT doesn't belong to the
- US, but KT does.
-
- W, N, and K calls:
- 1x1: 3 * 10 * 26 = 780
- 2x1: 3 * 26 * 10 * 26 = 20280
- 2x2: 3 * 26 * 10 * 26 * 26 = 527280
- 2x3: 3 * 26 * 10 * 26 * 26 * 26 = 13709280
- 1x2: 3 * 10 * 26 * 26 = 20280
- 1x3: 3 * 10 * 26 * 26 * 26 = 527280
-
- A calls (ONLY AA-AL are allowed. A6 = Oman, AP = Pakistan, etc.)
-
- 2x1: 12 * 10 * 26 = 3120
- 2x2: 12 * 10 * 26 * 26 = 81120
- 2x3: 12 * 10 * 26 * 26 * 26 = 2109120
-
- Summing up, we've got 16,998,450 minus the FUK, FUC, ASS, KKK,
- and Q-signals. So there are are still well over 16 million
- possible calls, and only 600,000 in use. Sorry, but evenually
- everyone will have to receive at 2x3 call, as this is by far
- the biggest pool. Hey, in the UK, they give "2E" calls to
- their equivalent of "No-Code Tech"s.
-
-
-
- --
- 73, _________ _________ The
- \ / Long Original
- Scott Rosenfeld Amateur Radio NF3I Burtonsville, MD | Live $5.00
- WAC-CW/SSB WAS DXCC - 130 QSLed on dipoles __________| Dipoles! Antenna!
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 94 09:04:30 PDT
- From: agate!howland.reston.ans.net!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!zip.eecs.umich.edu!yeshua.marcam.com!news.kei.com!ssd.intel.com!chnews!news@ames.arpa
- Subject: Radio Shack mast
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- I have one, however I use it to support one end of my 40 meter dipole.
- I personally don't feel it would support a full size tribander during
- high winds or iceing.
-
- Just my option, Tom WB7ASR...
-
- In article <wildoneCvBn6A.5FH@netcom.com>, <wildone@netcom.com> writes:
-
- > Has anyone used a Radio Shack 36' mast to mount a tribander?
- > I've got an old high-gain with traps and would like it up cheep and easy.
- > Any better ideas?
- >
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1994 17:13:50 GMT
- From: newsgate.melpar.esys.com!melpar!phb@uunet.uu.net
- Subject: Radio Shack mast
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- Tom WB7ASR <tom_boza@ccm.hf.intel.com> writes:
-
- >I have one, however I use it to support one end of my 40 meter dipole.
- >I personally don't feel it would support a full size tribander during
- >high winds or iceing.
-
- >> Has anyone used a Radio Shack 36' mast to mount a tribander?
- >> I've got an old high-gain with traps and would like it up cheep and easy.
- >> Any better ideas?
-
- About 10 years ago I installed one of those hummers for my Dad,
- WA4CVA (now a SK) with a Alliance U-100 TV rotator and a Cushcraft
- "Jr. Boomer" for two meters. My brother helped with the installation,
- and we had good solid footing for the mast, heavy screw-in anchors for
- the guys, and (as I recall) three sets of guys installed "by the book."
-
- About a year after the installation, a heavy windstorm came up and
- the antenna began to oscillate back and forth (partially because there
- was no rotor brake on the TV rotator) and the resulting vibration caused
- the top section to buckle and collapse, rendering the top portion of
- the mast useless and severely damaging the antenna. Winds were about 50
- MPH gusts, as I recall.
-
- The long and short of it is that I would not trust one of those
- masts to carry anything other than a fixed, non-rotatable TV antenna
- or a two-meter vertical. The extra weight of even a small rotator
- at the top is too much if any appreciable wind side load develops.
-
- IMHO; others may disagree. BTW, my brother had checked several
- times to make sure the guys stayed properly tensioned, and my Dad
- turned the antenna into the prevailing wind as the gusts increased,
- but to no avail.
-
- 73,
-
- Paul, K4MSG pbock@melpar.esys.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 1994 15:37:32 GMT
- From: ucsnews!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!europa.eng.gtefsd.com!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!zip.eecs.umich.edu!yeshua.marcam.com!charnel.ecst.csuchico.edu!olivea!news.@ihnp4.ucsd.edu
- Subject: SSTV Question
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- I saw an ad from a company with a name something like Harlan
- Software (sorry the ad is at home) offering a program to send
- and receive SSTV using a PC with a Soundblaster card. Anyone
- have any experience with this program? How does it perform and
- does it provide the most commonly used SSTV modes?
-
- Thanks and 73
- John Siegel K4BNC
- jas@hrollie.att.com
- --
- John Siegel
- jas@hrolie.hr.att.com
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 30 Aug 1994 08:29:55 -0500
- From: elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!news.uh.edu!uuneo.neosoft.com!blkbox.COM!not-for-mail@ames.arpa
- Subject: WANTED: Old HP parts/equipment
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- This may seemt sound dumb, but what the heck is a HP113BR ?
-
- ------------------------------
-
- Date: 29 Aug 1994 20:05:03 -0400
- From: newstf01.cr1.aol.com!search01.news.aol.com!not-for-mail@uunet.uu.net
- Subject: WTD: Repeater directory in ASCII (New England/NY)
- To: info-hams@ucsd.edu
-
- Does anyone have a repeater directory listing in ASCII or other common
- database format? I am looking for the New England and NY areas.
-
- Thanks! - Rob, N1NTE (email - RobB873302@aol.com)
-
- ------------------------------
-
- End of Info-Hams Digest V94 #979
- ******************************
-